 Poster: A snowHead
|
| rob@rar wrote: |
| Perhaps you just like the sound of your own voice? |
Yeah, came to that conclusion a while back. Also I'm guessing has recently learnt the words centripetal and proprioception, so needs to use them as much as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
| GinaMae wrote: |
| ...I know, that centripetal-force is also conservation of rotational-momentum... |
In what universe?
Like many of your posts, it's just word salad.
The only reasonable explanation is you're just trolling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
| beester1976 wrote: |
| you just enjoy listening to yourself, but you are not listening. |
How am I managing to respond to people with logical and reasoned posts directly on point to their points? Of course I am listening. I am a retired librarian. Listening was my job, and I am good at it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
| adithorp wrote: |
| GinaMae wrote: |
| ...I know, that centripetal-force is also conservation of rotational-momentum... |
In what universe?
Like many of your posts, it's just word salad.
The only reasonable explanation is you're just trolling. |
This might be simple enough for you to understand:
"It’s among the most iconic imagery of any Winter Olympics: A figure skater goes into a slow spin with arms outstretched to the side. As she coils her arms to her chest or draws them together above her head, as so many skaters do to cap a performance, that rotation accelerates into a dizzying blur. But what exactly accounts for the transition from sleepy spin to whirling dervish?
'It turns out that the trick isn’t in the footwork, but in the physics,' said Gay, the Willa Cather Professor of physics and astronomy. 'She’s using a principle called conservation of angular momentum.”"
https://news.unl.edu/newsrooms/today/article/physics-of-olympian-feats-spinning-figure-skater/
It's Nebraska, and in a newspaper, so that is about as simple as the writer can bring it down to. Perhaps it is not so far over your head that with somebody else's help, you can make sense of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
|
@GinaMae, you are AI and I claim my $5
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
I've seen some shïte in my time on here, & believe me there's plenty but this completely takes the biscuit.
WTF are you on about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GinaMae wrote: |
| Perhaps it is not so far over your head that with somebody else's help, you can make sense of it. |
How rude!
You are a librarian..I get that and what motivates you. A little professional respect for others, who have commented, who are expert in the field you are asking about wouldn't go amiss.
Your posts are convoluted, laborious and very hard to follow (and I'm not slow...Trust me).
You came here looking for advice/answers. You don't like what you are hearing. Why keep coming back?
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
| GinaMae wrote: |
| adithorp wrote: |
| GinaMae wrote: |
| ...I know, that centripetal-force is also conservation of rotational-momentum... |
In what universe?
Like many of your posts, it's just word salad.
The only reasonable explanation is you're just trolling. |
This might be simple enough for you to understand:
"It’s among the most iconic imagery of any Winter Olympics: A figure skater goes into a slow spin with arms outstretched to the side. As she coils her arms to her chest or draws them together above her head, as so many skaters do to cap a performance, that rotation accelerates into a dizzying blur. But what exactly accounts for the transition from sleepy spin to whirling dervish?
'It turns out that the trick isn’t in the footwork, but in the physics,' said Gay, the Willa Cather Professor of physics and astronomy. 'She’s using a principle called conservation of angular momentum.”"
https://news.unl.edu/newsrooms/today/article/physics-of-olympian-feats-spinning-figure-skater/
It's Nebraska, and in a newspaper, so that is about as simple as the writer can bring it down to. Perhaps it is not so far over your head that with somebody else's help, you can make sense of it. |
But conservation of angular momentum isn't and never has been the same as centripetal force.You don't understand physics any better than you understand skiing. Maybe you should have read some of those books in the library.
Definate trolling and I'm out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are not in a library. I can return insult for insult here. I was replying to three insults:
"In what universe? Like many of your posts, it's just word salad. The only reasonable explanation is you're just trolling."
|
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
|
@GinaMae, they weren't insults...
|
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
|
Conservation of rotational momentum is an aspect of centripetal-force. If you can find wikipedia, look it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GinaMae wrote: |
| "The only reasonable explanation is you're just trolling." |
I'd take it if I were you. The alternative is that you believe the BS you're spouting here.
It's fun when a newbie like this pops up. Helps pass the time until first lift tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
| holidayloverxx wrote: |
| @GinaMae, they weren't insults... |
I just looked it up, and you are right. Calling someone a troll is a high compliment, on South Park, among third-graders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
@rob@rar, 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
|
@GinaMae, aren't the kids in South Park are in fourth grade...so much for research
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
During the first 58 episodes, the children were in the third grade. During the fourth season, they entered the fourth grade, where they have remained ever since.
Miracle of miracles, two people can disagree, and both be right.
Last edited by Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see? on Sun 7-01-24 23:33; edited 2 times in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
| GinaMae wrote: |
| holidayloverxx wrote: |
| @GinaMae, they weren't insults... |
I just looked it up, and you are right. Calling someone a troll is a high compliment, on South Park, among third-graders. |
I love that you looked it up...librarian! I meant..as you will almost certainly figure...that they were true observations not insults. I didn't mention trolling. Are you struggling to keep up?. Fair effort but must do better
Keep it coming; the entertainment value is worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
| pam w wrote: |
| ... ratty. |
No, this is fecking hilarious. Anyone who has ever taught a truculent student will be laughing hard right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GinaMae wrote: |
| Miracle of miracles, two people can disagree, and both be right. |
Even with this you can't admit that you're wrong They're not in third grade, they used to be, which is the case for most fourth graders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
| rob@rar wrote: |
| pam w wrote: |
| ... ratty. |
No, this is fecking hilarious. Anyone who has ever taught a truculent student will be laughing hard right now. |
Kept me entertained on a lazy Sunday where I couldn't be bothered to move. Good work by the creator, AI or otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"just looked it up" was sarcasm.
You called me out for rudeness to Adi, who had called me a troll. I never said that you called me a troll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
snowHeads are a friendly bunch.
|
| SnoodyMcFlude wrote: |
| rob@rar wrote: |
| pam w wrote: |
| ... ratty. |
No, this is fecking hilarious. Anyone who has ever taught a truculent student will be laughing hard right now. |
Kept me entertained on a lazy Sunday where I couldn't be bothered to move. Good work by the creator, AI or otherwise. |
Couldn't be bothered to move, or couldn't be bothered to think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
And love to help out and answer questions and of course, read each other's snow reports.
|
@GinaMae, your sarcasm was a little subtle then. One shouldn't need to explain sarcasm.
I see what you mean re trolling...you were still rude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SnoodyMcFlude wrote: |
| GinaMae wrote: |
| Miracle of miracles, two people can disagree, and both be right. |
Even with this you can't admit that you're wrong They're not in third grade, they used to be, which is the case for most fourth graders. |
OMG, you are so smart! You proved beyond any doubt that everything I say must be wrong, since I know so little about South Park.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know it makes sense.
|
|
@GinaMae, little from column A, little from column B, it is a Sunday after all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name:
|
| holidayloverxx wrote: |
| @GinaMae, your sarcasm was a little subtle then. One shouldn't need to explain sarcasm. |
| GinaMae wrote: |
| OMG, you are so smart! You proved beyond any doubt that everything I say must be wrong, since I know so little about South Park. |
Finally, they've taken on board some advice!!! Hallelujah, we can all rejoice
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poster: A snowHead
|
|
|
|
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
Obviously A snowHead isn't a real person
|
|
|
|
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
Well, the person's real but it's just a made up name, see?
|
|
@GinaMae, I said they weren't insults...you agreed....so your post makes no sense. No change there then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You need to Login to know who's really who.
You need to Login to know who's really who.
|
|
@GinaMae, I can't see any relevance to The Dozens in this exchange. No-one is egging you on to insult
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
Anyway, snowHeads is much more fun if you do.
|
That said. You've started a game of The Dozens, and snowheads, being largely not African American, have fallen into the trap
Well played
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to Register first of course.
You'll need to Register first of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If this person is real, ie not AI or troll, her skiing is the least of her problems. I find it sad and not at all entertaining.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@Hurtle, It would be interesting to compare comments if the same OP was put on TGR, Realskiers or Pugski in the USA 
|
|
|
|
|
|
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
You'll get to see more forums and be part of the best ski club on the net.
|
|
I can tell you on the dutch/belgian ski forum she would have already been banned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| skimottaret wrote: |
| @Hurtle, It would be interesting to compare comments if the same OP was put on TGR, Realskiers or Pugski in the USA |
Eaten alive. We are considerably more civilised and tolerant here, but if people like to keep digging there are limits to how far snowHeads will pretend to be helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
